<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RESEARCH METHODOLOGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doresearch.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doresearch.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Literature Review on Research Methodology for Social and Design Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:56:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='doresearch.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://doresearch.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="RESEARCH METHODOLOGY" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://doresearch.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>“Likert Scales: How to (Ab)use Them” &#8211; II</title>
		<link>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/%e2%80%9clikert-scales-how-to-abuse-them%e2%80%9d-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/%e2%80%9clikert-scales-how-to-abuse-them%e2%80%9d-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hisham Md Basir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doresearch.wordpress.com/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my colleagues told me about a weblog that replied on my previous entry entitled “Likert Scale: How to (Ab)use them?”. I browsed through the weblog and I found it is very useful as well as very informative. I would like to encourage all visitors to visit and read the weblog here. 16 years [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=doresearch.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4400812&amp;post=535&amp;subd=doresearch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/%e2%80%9clikert-scales-how-to-abuse-them%e2%80%9d-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hmb</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Using Narrative Literature Reviews to Build a Scientific Knowledge Base”</title>
		<link>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/%e2%80%9cusing-narrative-literature-reviews-to-build-a-scientific-knowledge-base%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/%e2%80%9cusing-narrative-literature-reviews-to-build-a-scientific-knowledge-base%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hisham Md Basir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doresearch.wordpress.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article by Rumrill, Phillip  D. Jr., and Fitzgerald, Shawn M. (2001) in Work, 16:2.   This paper describes one of the literature review method that is most interpretive-qualitative in nature, i.e. the narrative review [i]. Although the discussion is very specific to the area of rehabilitation research (one research area in education), I believe that [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=doresearch.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4400812&amp;post=501&amp;subd=doresearch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/%e2%80%9cusing-narrative-literature-reviews-to-build-a-scientific-knowledge-base%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hmb</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research”</title>
		<link>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/%e2%80%9cunderstanding-the-role-and-methods-of-meta-analysis-in-is-research%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/%e2%80%9cunderstanding-the-role-and-methods-of-meta-analysis-in-is-research%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hisham Md Basir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta-Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualitative Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descriptive Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote Counting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doresearch.wordpress.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article by King, William R., and He, Jun (2005) in Communications of the AIS, 16.   There are four methods in conducting literature review, i.e. Narrative Review, Descriptive Review, Vote Counting and Meta-Analysis. Look at the diagram at the end of this entry to view these methods in the qualitative-quantitative continuum.   Meta-analysis is considered [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=doresearch.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4400812&amp;post=492&amp;subd=doresearch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/%e2%80%9cunderstanding-the-role-and-methods-of-meta-analysis-in-is-research%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hmb</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://doresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/review-methods1.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">review-methods1</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://doresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/effect-sizes.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">effect-sizes</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://doresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/meta-analysis-models.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">meta-analysis-models</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“The Relative Validity of Inferences about Mediation as a Function of Research Design Characteristics”</title>
		<link>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/%e2%80%9cthe-relative-validity-of-inferences-about-mediation-as-a-function-of-research-design-characteristics%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/%e2%80%9cthe-relative-validity-of-inferences-about-mediation-as-a-function-of-research-design-characteristics%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hisham Md Basir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Causal Inferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation/Mediator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doresearch.wordpress.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article by Stone-Romero, Eugene F., and Rosopa, Patrick J. (2008) in Organizational Research Methods, 11:2.   Let say we want to conduct a study with the simplest mediation model, X à M à Y, in order to gain the maximum internal validity inferences, we have to carry out two randomized experiments; one to prove the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=doresearch.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4400812&amp;post=481&amp;subd=doresearch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/%e2%80%9cthe-relative-validity-of-inferences-about-mediation-as-a-function-of-research-design-characteristics%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hmb</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research”</title>
		<link>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/%e2%80%9cvalidation-guidelines-for-is-positivist-research%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/%e2%80%9cvalidation-guidelines-for-is-positivist-research%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hisham Md Basir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Positivist Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questionnaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Method Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construct Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convergent Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discriminant Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Factorial validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manipulation Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomological Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistical Conclusion Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unidimensional Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doresearch.wordpress.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article by Straub, Detma; Boudreau, Marie-Claude; Gefen, David (2004) in Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13.   Prior to reading this article, I’ve read two papers written by the same authors, i.e. Straub (1989)[i] and Boudreau, Gefen &#38; Straub (2001)[ii]. I think, this paper is the conclusion of those two earlier papers. The [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=doresearch.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4400812&amp;post=465&amp;subd=doresearch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/%e2%80%9cvalidation-guidelines-for-is-positivist-research%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hmb</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
